There are basically two schools of thought in respect to
servicing a vintage watch - if we eliminate the ‘Don’t Know’ or ‘Don’t Care’ contingents.
The first is the ‘Wear It Until It Drops’ school, members of which can be seen
arguing vociferously against regular servicing on various watch fora. The
second group could be described as the ‘Preventative School’, which advocates
regular service regimes in both new and vintage watches so as to prevent
premature wear of watch components and thus ensure the long-term serviceability
of their watches.
In some ways these two schools of thought represent extremes
of personality and reflect how individuals value and appreciate objects - those
who value their possessions, or at least recognise the effort it took to earn
the money to acquire them (and hence a belief in “looking after” them), versus
those who perhaps do not have such a deep interest or appreciation of the
technical or mechanical aspects of their possessions and think “If it breaks, I’ll
get it fixed or get another”
To me, the statement “I haven’t had the back of my Omega opened
for fifteen years, and it’s still going strong” is one of the most gormless and
naive statements that could reach my ears, but maybe that’s because I lean
closer to the Preventative School than the other. In reality, it is not so cut and dried, and
there are a number of variables to consider when deciding when to service your
watch. One of the most balanced and
informative essays on this topic I have seen in a long time was posted here on
Watchuseek by a contributor known as ‘Archer’.
Also, Nicholas Hacko, a well-respected Australia watchmaker, argues here that a proper understanding of watch servicing is of great importance to owners of mechanical watches.
Also, Nicholas Hacko, a well-respected Australia watchmaker, argues here that a proper understanding of watch servicing is of great importance to owners of mechanical watches.
I recommend you take a peek.
Archer often contributes fascinating stuff, there was one a while back about resuscitating a flooded speedmaster that was like watching a car crash in reverse. I agree on the article you reference, it makes a lot of compelling sense. If nothing else, I send new acquisitions to a watchmaker who checks to see if the critical parts of the movement are lubricated and he only charges a token amount for the spot check.
ReplyDeleteGreat to have such a resource close by.
DeleteNothing like a good tradesman to check out one's acquisitions, something that I believe should be done at purchase, no matter what a seller claims.
Cheers
Desmond