tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30329246.post1046350825329878331..comments2024-03-14T10:09:15.360+08:00Comments on Omega Constellation Collectors: The Omega Constellation 168.001 JumboDesmondhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14148245572518221306noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30329246.post-41615807193167986762020-12-30T17:00:32.647+08:002020-12-30T17:00:32.647+08:00Hard to be certain as I can see a slight convexity...Hard to be certain as I can see a slight convexity to the side of the crown. The 4214s were were quite narrow. <br /><br />I think it's a miracle that you've come across a 42055 in gold as these have been discontinued for years.<br /><br />It will be a hard trawl methinks before you find ne in stainless. You could try a 4214 because it is the same crown pipe size.<br /><br />Happy Desmondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14148245572518221306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30329246.post-29497892151653525812020-12-30T16:16:41.473+08:002020-12-30T16:16:41.473+08:00Hi, I have an Omega 168001 with incorrect crown. F...Hi, I have an Omega 168001 with incorrect crown. From my research and an old booklet I found that the correct fitting crown should be a 42055 crown. However, I found only yellow gold versions of this crown. The crown displayed above looks a lot like a 4204. Can I get your opinion on this matter?<br /><br />Thanks in advance!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com